What is your answer?
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 7.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
This is an important part of an investigation, but it isn't itself logical reasoning.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
This is an important part of an investigation, but it isn't itself logical reasoning.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
This is an important part of an investigation, but it isn't itself logical reasoning.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
The other things are important parts of an investigation. The climax of the process is when we take a stand and try to justify it. We explain that the answer must be such and such, and we point to other facts to justify our answer. This is logical reasoning, where we go from premises to a conclusion.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
5 is wrong. Please try again.
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
This is an important part of an investigation, but it isn't itself logical reasoning.
<= back | menu | forward =>
6 is wrong. Please try again.
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
This is an important part of an investigation, but it isn't itself logical reasoning.
<= back | menu | forward =>
7 is wrong. Please try again.
To reason logically about an issue, strictly speaking, is
{ 1 } - to weigh pros and cons.
{ 2 } - to gather background information.
{ 3 } - to consider alternative views and possible objections to them.
{ 4 } - to go from premises to a conclusion.
{ 5 } - to clarify the question.
{ 6 } - to make distinctions.
{ 7 } - to review what others have said.
This is an important part of an investigation, but it isn't itself logical reasoning.
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end