What is your answer?
Which is NOT one of the recommended three steps for criticizing racist arguments by appealing to consistency and factual accuracy?
{ 1 } - Formulate the argument. The premises must be clearly stated, and the conclusion must clearly follow from the premises.
{ 2 } - See if the racist applies his moral premise consistently to actual or hypothetical cases -- especially ones involving his own race.
{ 3 } - If needed, criticize the factual premises.
{ 4 } - Tell the racist that everyone, of whatever race, is entitled to respect and consideration.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 4.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT one of the recommended three steps for criticizing racist arguments by appealing to consistency and factual accuracy?
{ 1 } - Formulate the argument. The premises must be clearly stated, and the conclusion must clearly follow from the premises.
{ 2 } - See if the racist applies his moral premise consistently to actual or hypothetical cases -- especially ones involving his own race.
{ 3 } - If needed, criticize the factual premises.
{ 4 } - Tell the racist that everyone, of whatever race, is entitled to respect and consideration.
This is one of the three steps.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT one of the recommended three steps for criticizing racist arguments by appealing to consistency and factual accuracy?
{ 1 } - Formulate the argument. The premises must be clearly stated, and the conclusion must clearly follow from the premises.
{ 2 } - See if the racist applies his moral premise consistently to actual or hypothetical cases -- especially ones involving his own race.
{ 3 } - If needed, criticize the factual premises.
{ 4 } - Tell the racist that everyone, of whatever race, is entitled to respect and consideration.
This is one of the three steps.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Which is NOT one of the recommended three steps for criticizing racist arguments by appealing to consistency and factual accuracy?
{ 1 } - Formulate the argument. The premises must be clearly stated, and the conclusion must clearly follow from the premises.
{ 2 } - See if the racist applies his moral premise consistently to actual or hypothetical cases -- especially ones involving his own race.
{ 3 } - If needed, criticize the factual premises.
{ 4 } - Tell the racist that everyone, of whatever race, is entitled to respect and consideration.
This is one of the three steps.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
Which is NOT one of the recommended three steps for criticizing racist arguments by appealing to consistency and factual accuracy?
{ 1 } - Formulate the argument. The premises must be clearly stated, and the conclusion must clearly follow from the premises.
{ 2 } - See if the racist applies his moral premise consistently to actual or hypothetical cases -- especially ones involving his own race.
{ 3 } - If needed, criticize the factual premises.
{ 4 } - Tell the racist that everyone, of whatever race, is entitled to respect and consideration.
If we just oppose the racist's view with our own, then the discussion will likely end in a stalemate.
We need to expose the flaws in the racist's reasoning. We need to show him why his reasoning doesn't work.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end