What is your answer?

On the approach in the book, the key to getting a methodology for picking out moral principles is

    { 1 } - to appeal to moral consistency principles.
    { 2 } - to deny that there is a "rational" method for picking out moral principles.
    { 3 } - to first get a clear understanding of the nature of moral judgments.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is correct!

On the approach in the book, the key to getting a methodology for picking out moral principles is

We need to work out moral consistency principles that are useful for moral reasoning. These principles will more clearly formulate ideas that are already widely accepted -- such as: "Be logically consistent in your beliefs," "Make similar evaluations about similar actions," and "Treat others as you want to be treated."

We'll show how to defend our consistency principles from various perspectives on ethics. Later, we'll add additional elements of moral rationality besides consistency.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

On the approach in the book, the key to getting a methodology for picking out moral principles is

    { 1 } - to appeal to moral consistency principles.
    { 2 } - to deny that there is a "rational" method for picking out moral principles.
    { 3 } - to first get a clear understanding of the nature of moral judgments.

The approach in the book holds that there is a rational method. The method stresses consistency and the golden rule, but also brings in other elements.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

On the approach in the book, the key to getting a methodology for picking out moral principles is

    { 1 } - to appeal to moral consistency principles.
    { 2 } - to deny that there is a "rational" method for picking out moral principles.
    { 3 } - to first get a clear understanding of the nature of moral judgments.

This approach leads to an impasse -- since people continue to disagree on how to understand moral judgments (as divine commands, irreducible objective truths, expressions of feeling, and so forth).

The approach in the book is to construct a system of moral consistency principles that could be justified from various views on the nature of moral judgments.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end