The possibility of fanatics shows that Hare's theory is ultimately unsuccessful in showing how ethics can be rational.
The possibility of fanatics shows that Hare's theory is ultimately unsuccessful in showing how ethics can be rational.
Hare's theory is mostly successful. It will usually (but not always) bring moral agreement through a rational method that doesn't assume prior agreement on moral principles.
Should we demand more than this?
The possibility of fanatics shows that Hare's theory is ultimately unsuccessful in showing how ethics can be rational.
Hare's theory is mostly successful. It will usually (but not always) bring moral agreement through a rational method that doesn't assume prior agreement on moral principles.
Should we demand more than this?